а вторую сторону конфликта Вы тоже заслушали ?Agrafena wrote:AKBApuyc wrote:Вам же я приписывал несколько другое:
вот это:"Никто им ничего не запрещает. У них там проблема с обменом, выдачей участка земли под церковь, что-то там с оплатой или наоборот - компенсацией. Нет у них участка, на котором они могли бы начать что-то строить, а им якобы кто-то запрещает (как Вы пытаетесь это нам обрисовать)".... - whose fantasies are those? mine or yours? Or does it matter .. as long as you have love for mankind?....![]()
"http://www.oca.org/news/2238
...the New York City-based Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America issued a statement concerning the church, the complete text of which reads as follows.
As is well known, on September 11, 2001, our city and nation suffered a terrorist attack of unparalleled proportions. In addition to the tragic and horrific loss of almost 3,000 innocent victims, a number of whom were members of our own community, the world witnessed the unimaginable collapse of the Twin Towers. When the second Tower fell, it landed on and erased all traces of the Greek Orthodox Christian Church of Saint Nicholas, the only house of worship destroyed that day. Opened in 1916 by a group of Greek immigrants, the church not only served the spiritual needs of its parishioners but was also a sacred space in which people of all ethnic and religious backgrounds working in the surrounding area would often stop, light a candle and spend a few moments in prayer and reflection.
"Following the events of 9/11, the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America and the Saint Nicholas parish fully cooperated and worked closely with the relevant authorities. Former Governor George Pataki pledged without reservation his support for rebuilding in the belief that it was a necessary part of the healing of New York City and of our nation. Early on, as plans were being formulated for the reconstruction of the area, the Church agreed to relocate and rebuild its house of worship at a new locale to facilitate the envisioned design for the overall site. In 2004, the authorities proposed that the new edifice be built at 130 Liberty Street, a parcel on the same block as the original site, and an agreement was reached between the Archdiocese and the Port Authority. Four successive LMDC/Port Authority administrations honored this mutual agreement which entailed extensive ongoing work and planning on the part of all parties. All site plans for the area which the LMDC/Port Authority released to the public show Saint Nicholas at this new locale. Regrettably, the latest Port Authority administration in 2009 unexpectedly and arbitrarily reneged on this agreement and as a result, the Archdiocese and St. Nicholas parish are suddenly offered no viable option. LMDC/Port Authority has refused to meet with us. In the meantime the LMDC/Port Authority has excavated the original site without our consent, rendering it unusable, in flagrant violation of our legal rights.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db49f/db49f1f21fe10eec8bea538d60b0d800522d08e9" alt="food :food:"
И таки где здесь запрешение им чего-либо строить ? Речь идет о выделении участка взамен старого. Если бы у них была земля - никто бы им ничего не смог запретить.