cowboy wrote:Да ну
Назовите нам уже заказчиков и главное их цели.
American foreign policy designed around “global leadership” and a Russian foreign policy premised on “regional hegemony.”
These two things just don’t fit together, something that is true completely independent of the Russian regime’s democratic
or autocratic credentials.
if the United States continues to view any attempt by a non-aligned power to exert regional influence as a
threat to be countered and if Russia continues to believe that it has the final say on the economic and
political trajectory of its neighbors, then conflict is inevitable.
So while he intended to shine a spotlight on the unique ills of Putinism,
Aron actually did a very fine job of highlighting precisely why
the United States and Russia are fated to be at loggerheads:
because the Russians, and not just Putin and his silovik cronies
but a broad swathe of the political elite, still think that they
are entitled to a privileged position of regional leadership.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markadomani ... -conflict/
в двух словах самая справедливая страна на земле, приследует свои национальные интересы.
но простодушные хомячки почему то думают что добрые дяди им помогут построить
коммунизм демократию
в отдельно взятой стране.
что такое демонизейшн, у "лектора" спросите?
BTW: я жду ответа на мой вопрос на счет иракских детей.
Буду вам признателен
.
. Открывайте новую тему - там и обсуждайте.
