late_morning_girl wrote:Митяй wrote:...
.
цыферки сначала про науку давайте. Я ж сказала - потом и поговорим.
--------- 2005 бюджет : -----
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=113
The NSF budget for research and related activities is being cut by .7% from its FY 2004 level, the first such cut in many years.
http://www.aip.org/fyi/2004/149.html
Buried within these 3,000 pages were eight pages on the National Science Foundation. This bill cuts NSF's budget by 1.9% for FY 2005.
----- 2008 бюджет : -----
http://slashdot.org/articles/07/12/19/1 ... tml?tid=98
"As reported by Science magazine, Congress has cut science funding increases for fiscal year 2008. This comes in spite of the earlier announced presidential initiative to increase funding for basic research to improve the future economic competitiveness of the United States. At best, funding increases are minor for some agencies such as NIH and NIST. Other agencies received severe cutbacks, like the Department of Energy Office of Science, which received $342 million less than expected. In particular, despite previous international commitments, funding for the ITER fusion reactor experiment is completely cut off. The NOVA neutrino oscillation experiment at Fermilab is also canceled, as well as R&D on the planned International Linear Collider. The Fermilab operating budget is cut by almost 20%, and may result in mass layoffs
http://blogs.physicstoday.org/newspicks ... big_d.html
WASHINGTON – Congressman Vernon J. Ehlers (R-MI) issued the following statement regarding federal funding for basic research and innovation passed by Congress this week in the Consolidated Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2008:
herefore, I am gravely disappointed with the funding levels provided for the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST), and the Office of Science at the Department of Energy (DOE) in the Consolidated Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2008. This bill fell dramatically short. Though modest increases were provided for NSF, NIST and the Office of Science, these increases essentially evaporate when Congressionally-directed funds, rescissions and inflation are considered. In light of the strong support requested by the President in his budget proposal, and the additional increases provided by both houses of Congress in their separate appropriations bills, the final numbers were an unanticipated blow. The original intent was to double the budgets of these agencies starting with the baseline of enacted funding from fiscal year 2006. Two years later, we are not even close to starting on that pathway. Furthermore, there is no way to sugarcoat the funding level for science and math education at the NSF, which has dropped to the lowest it has been since 2000 and a full twenty percent below the amount authorized in the COMPETES Act.
-----------------------
Ну так что такое "вкачать в экономику" ?
А пристыдишь их - и сальцо найдется, и горилочка...
:
