Drusha wrote:"И индусам тоже?" (c)
В сад, все в сад (с)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33a2e/33a2e1e6405bcdd31c7770d38a2b504fd2400c29" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
Yiduke wrote:I almost love the guy* - whoops, the prior post said it's SHE
http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/2007 ... fgren.shtm
если еще когото можно любить в состоянии когда тебя и DOS & USCIS отьимели)
Yiduke wrote:I almost love the guy* - whoops, the prior post said it's SHE
http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/2007 ... fgren.shtm
если еще когото можно любить в состоянии когда тебя и DOS & USCIS отьимели)
nukite wrote:Это женщина
nukite wrote:Yiduke wrote:I almost love the guy* - whoops, the prior post said it's SHE
http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/2007 ... fgren.shtm
если еще когото можно любить в состоянии когда тебя и DOS & USCIS отьимели)
Это женщина
Разве за ними поспееш. Нюрка опередила
FULL-BLOWN SCANDAL
[NOTE: A hat tip to my friend Jay Solomon for tipping us off on this story]
What started out as a story of mean-spiritedness at USCIS regarding efforts to head off accepting visa applications in July may be turning in to a serious scandal that involves blatant disregard for the law and a potential jeopardization of national security.
<b>The American Immigration Lawyers Association and others are reporting that USCIS adjudicators were issued instructions to pull for processing every employment-based case that had been pending for more than six months regardless of whether security clearances had been completed. </b>Officials worked at a frantic pace over last weekend to request visa numbers on all these cases in order to head off accepting any cases when the first business day of the month began yesterday.
USCIS would have had to have requested numbers in about 60,000 cases in order to exhaust its numbers. The big question is whether the agency finished security clearances on all those cases, something that seems impossible given how long security clearance backlogs have been. These delays have been well-documented and are the basis of mandamus cases all across the country.
So assuming security clearances were not received, that leaves one of two possibilities:
a. USCIS was going to approve these cases without getting a security clearance or
b. USCIS was not really finished with the cases and was requesting visa numbers before they were really finished with the cases.
If the first is true, this will be front page news around the world and there will likely be resignations at the agency. While this may be the juicier story, the second is the more likely explanation.
But even if USCIS intended to finish the security clearances before issuing actual approvals, this is still a violation of the law.
By law (8 USC Section 1255), a visa number should not be claimed by USCIS until an applicant's adjustment of status application has been granted.
If any of you have heard anything that would tend to support this, please let me know.
slozovsk wrote:nukite wrote:Yiduke wrote:I almost love the guy* - whoops, the prior post said it's SHE
http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/2007 ... fgren.shtm
если еще когото можно любить в состоянии когда тебя и DOS & USCIS отьимели)
Это женщина
Разве за ними поспееш. Нюрка опередила
Наша Зоя из San Jose
Strange News from AILA, Why would they do this?
Submitted by Rajiv S. Khanna on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 2:43pm.
How Did All Those Employment-Based Numbers Get "Used" So Quickly?
AILA members have been receiving reports from multiple officials within USCIS indicating that USCIS HQ recently issued instructions to pull for adjudication every employment-based case that had been pending for more than six months, regardless of whether background checks were cleared. USCIS offices report having worked all of the weekend of June 30, 2007, to comply with these instructions. This was apparently to use up as many visa numbers as possible in order to try to cut off receipt of new filings when most employment-based visa categories came current on 7/1/07.
Note that this information has not been confirmed by USCIS HQ.
Белочех wrote:http://www.forclients.com/cmsd/node/82Strange News from AILA, Why would they do this?
Submitted by Rajiv S. Khanna on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 2:43pm.
How Did All Those Employment-Based Numbers Get "Used" So Quickly?
AILA members have been receiving reports from multiple officials within USCIS indicating that USCIS HQ recently issued instructions to pull for adjudication every employment-based case that had been pending for more than six months, regardless of whether background checks were cleared. USCIS offices report having worked all of the weekend of June 30, 2007, to comply with these instructions. This was apparently to use up as many visa numbers as possible in order to try to cut off receipt of new filings when most employment-based visa categories came current on 7/1/07.
Note that this information has not been confirmed by USCIS HQ.
Nervous wrote:Так что, смотрите на вещи более оптимистично