Dear Sir,
I filled for my wife’s permanent residency (Green Card) in January 2006 as a “spouse of US citizen”. The case moved at a steady pace and we had interview with the USCIS district office at San Francisco in July 2006. The officer approved the case and told us that name check is pending and once that is cleared, the Green Card will be sent in mail.
We have been waiting almost a year .My wife’s status can not be adjusted because of this delay in security clearance.
Following are the details of my case:
Applicant Name:
SS#:
Date of Birth:
USCIS Receipt Numbers:
Applicant:
Country of Birth: Russia
Address:
Phone:
Date of Application 01/26/2006 (Receipt is enclosed)
Date of Interview 07/05/2006 (Officer notified that name check is pending)
Considering the usual trend, I was expecting the Green Card in 120 after the interview. I kept waiting as I didn’t intend to disrupt the normal processing. However, it seems that there has been a significant delay now (6 months).
I have written letters to Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman, Congressman Tom Lantos and Senator Dianne Feinstein.
I WILL BE FILING A MANDAMUS SUIT WITH THE STATE’S FEDERAL COURT IF MY CASE IS NOT COMPLETED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE.
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Sincerely yours,
приклыдываете все копии вашего дела и certified mail
expedite name check
-
Polinnka
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 765
- Joined: 24 Jun 2004 21:24
- Location: Mocква->TX->SFBA ->DC -> ?
-
Berez
- Новичок
- Posts: 32
- Joined: 01 Aug 2006 07:29
- Location: Oakland, CA
, Chertoffa... Prishlite ih imena-adresa pozgaluysta. S uvazgeniem!-
Polinnka
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 765
- Joined: 24 Jun 2004 21:24
- Location: Mocква->TX->SFBA ->DC -> ?
Конгрессмен – поглядите сами куда вы относитесь .
Сенаторы - у меня Калифонийские, у них на сaйте еще есть privacy release form в PDF, которую надо заполнить
United States Senator Barbara Boxer
1700 Montgomery Street, Suite 240
San Francisco, CA 94111
http://boxer.senate.gov/services/fedagency/immigration/
Senator Dianne Feinstein
United States Senate
One Post Street, Suite 2450
San Francisco, CA 94104 но на имя Stella Lyazer, Director of Constituent Services
http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/ ... s.Casework
Фест Леди Лаура Буш
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Federal Bureau of Investigation -- этотим FIOIA request
Record Information/Dissemination Section (RIDS)
Service Request Unit, room 6359
935 Pensylvania avu, N.W.
Washington DC, 20535
Вот этим всем – 30 дней письмо , ну и жалобу заодно ..
David N.Still --- это наш, Калифорнийский
District Director
Citizenship and Immigration Service
630 Sansome Street
San Francsico, CA 94111
Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
US Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528
Emilio T. Gonzales, Director of USCIS
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Washington, DC 90258
Robert S. Mueller, III, Director of FBI
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20535-0001
Office of the General Counsel
Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528
и вот такой еще письмо
Dear Senator Boxer,
I am writing this letter to request your Senatorial intervention to resolve a bureaucratic deadlock in the processing of my wife’s applications for adjustment to permanent resident status. As you may know an application for adjustment to permanent resident status is not a request for an immigrant visa, but rather just a procedural process to make official the permanent resident status of an individual to whom an immigration visa has already been given based on the person’s proven qualifications.
One particular procedure called “security clearance” has gone well beyond its reasonableness in my wife’s particular case. The name check process is said to have a turnaround time of about three days, but my wife’s case has been stuck in this last step for apparently longer than a 6 months now, while normal processing time after the interview is assumed to be under 120 days, and the entire case has slipped into an unknown holdup with no sign of progress.
On January 26, 2006, I applied for adjustment of status (I-485) for my wife based on the approval of my I-130 petition as a “Spouse of American Citizen.” As I mentioned in the beginning of this letter, the I-485 process is a post-approval process to formally change the status of a non-immigrant to that of an immigrant. She's got her fingerprints done on Apr 05, 2006 and she had her interview with an immigration officer on July 05, 2006 in San Francisco, CA. Having an interview with a local immigration officer typically marks a final relief of an applicant because usually the decision is made on that same day and the applicant legally accepted as an immigrant. However, despite a successful interview with the local immigration officer, decision has been delayed, and as a result her status remains pending
We were told that the cause for this surprising delay is in the name security clearance. I consider this to be a very unlikely reason as her last name is quite unique. She has 12 letters in her last name, which is very uncommon for our country. On Jan 12, 2007 we had Infopass in San Francisco office CIS, and we was not able to find what is the case status.
These unwarranted delays in her green card processing are causing us significant hardship. My wife has and Employment Authorization Card, but it is temporary authorization, which is valid for a year, and it limits her options to find a job since employers always have a great concern about what is going to happened after authorization is expired and what if USCIS will not renew the authorization in the proper time; moreover my wife can not take any job which requires business trips abroad since Advance parole, which was issued by USCIS is not suitable for such trips. We are also cannot take a trip to my wife's home country to visit my wife's relatives. Delays in the processing of the application (presumably caused by delays in name check processing) are causing our family moral and financial hardship.
Dear Senator Boxer, we now have no other recourse except for turning to your Senatorial influence. In addition to your sympathy to the suffering of your constituents, I know you also care about the reasonableness, fairness and the basic due process of the government. I as a US citizen, therefore petition you, dear senator to send a letter to Agent David Hardy, the Chief of the Record/Information Dissemination Section in the Record Management Division (RMD), FBI, and ask to complete the name check procedures for my wife in a timely manner. I also ask you to send a letter to David N. Still, CIS District Director in San Francisco and ask him to expedite the approval of my wife's adjustment of status application. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
XXXXX
I hereby request the assistance of the Office of United States Senator Barbara Boxer in resolving the matter described above and authorize Senator Barbara Boxer and her staff to receive any information which they might need in order to provide this assistance.
Сенаторы - у меня Калифонийские, у них на сaйте еще есть privacy release form в PDF, которую надо заполнить
United States Senator Barbara Boxer
1700 Montgomery Street, Suite 240
San Francisco, CA 94111
http://boxer.senate.gov/services/fedagency/immigration/
Senator Dianne Feinstein
United States Senate
One Post Street, Suite 2450
San Francisco, CA 94104 но на имя Stella Lyazer, Director of Constituent Services
http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/ ... s.Casework
Фест Леди Лаура Буш
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Federal Bureau of Investigation -- этотим FIOIA request
Record Information/Dissemination Section (RIDS)
Service Request Unit, room 6359
935 Pensylvania avu, N.W.
Washington DC, 20535
Вот этим всем – 30 дней письмо , ну и жалобу заодно ..
David N.Still --- это наш, Калифорнийский
District Director
Citizenship and Immigration Service
630 Sansome Street
San Francsico, CA 94111
Alberto R. Gonzales, United States Attorney General
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
US Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528
Emilio T. Gonzales, Director of USCIS
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Washington, DC 90258
Robert S. Mueller, III, Director of FBI
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20535-0001
Office of the General Counsel
Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528
и вот такой еще письмо
Dear Senator Boxer,
I am writing this letter to request your Senatorial intervention to resolve a bureaucratic deadlock in the processing of my wife’s applications for adjustment to permanent resident status. As you may know an application for adjustment to permanent resident status is not a request for an immigrant visa, but rather just a procedural process to make official the permanent resident status of an individual to whom an immigration visa has already been given based on the person’s proven qualifications.
One particular procedure called “security clearance” has gone well beyond its reasonableness in my wife’s particular case. The name check process is said to have a turnaround time of about three days, but my wife’s case has been stuck in this last step for apparently longer than a 6 months now, while normal processing time after the interview is assumed to be under 120 days, and the entire case has slipped into an unknown holdup with no sign of progress.
On January 26, 2006, I applied for adjustment of status (I-485) for my wife based on the approval of my I-130 petition as a “Spouse of American Citizen.” As I mentioned in the beginning of this letter, the I-485 process is a post-approval process to formally change the status of a non-immigrant to that of an immigrant. She's got her fingerprints done on Apr 05, 2006 and she had her interview with an immigration officer on July 05, 2006 in San Francisco, CA. Having an interview with a local immigration officer typically marks a final relief of an applicant because usually the decision is made on that same day and the applicant legally accepted as an immigrant. However, despite a successful interview with the local immigration officer, decision has been delayed, and as a result her status remains pending
We were told that the cause for this surprising delay is in the name security clearance. I consider this to be a very unlikely reason as her last name is quite unique. She has 12 letters in her last name, which is very uncommon for our country. On Jan 12, 2007 we had Infopass in San Francisco office CIS, and we was not able to find what is the case status.
These unwarranted delays in her green card processing are causing us significant hardship. My wife has and Employment Authorization Card, but it is temporary authorization, which is valid for a year, and it limits her options to find a job since employers always have a great concern about what is going to happened after authorization is expired and what if USCIS will not renew the authorization in the proper time; moreover my wife can not take any job which requires business trips abroad since Advance parole, which was issued by USCIS is not suitable for such trips. We are also cannot take a trip to my wife's home country to visit my wife's relatives. Delays in the processing of the application (presumably caused by delays in name check processing) are causing our family moral and financial hardship.
Dear Senator Boxer, we now have no other recourse except for turning to your Senatorial influence. In addition to your sympathy to the suffering of your constituents, I know you also care about the reasonableness, fairness and the basic due process of the government. I as a US citizen, therefore petition you, dear senator to send a letter to Agent David Hardy, the Chief of the Record/Information Dissemination Section in the Record Management Division (RMD), FBI, and ask to complete the name check procedures for my wife in a timely manner. I also ask you to send a letter to David N. Still, CIS District Director in San Francisco and ask him to expedite the approval of my wife's adjustment of status application. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
XXXXX
I hereby request the assistance of the Office of United States Senator Barbara Boxer in resolving the matter described above and authorize Senator Barbara Boxer and her staff to receive any information which they might need in order to provide this assistance.
-
MBS
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006 05:16
Кто знает, кому exactly надо адресовать письмо, чтобы expedite name check?
Понравилась прозвучавшая здесь идея, что детям FAFSA для колледжа не полагается из-за того что гринкарты нет. Вдруг, прокатит?
Во вторник пойду на infopass по этому поводу, узнавать, какие подтверждающие документы прикладывать (кроме самой FAFSA application, где написано, кому она положена).
Если у кого образец подобного письма есть, буду премного благодарен!
Понравилась прозвучавшая здесь идея, что детям FAFSA для колледжа не полагается из-за того что гринкарты нет. Вдруг, прокатит?
Во вторник пойду на infopass по этому поводу, узнавать, какие подтверждающие документы прикладывать (кроме самой FAFSA application, где написано, кому она положена).
Если у кого образец подобного письма есть, буду премного благодарен!
-
NskCA
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 1562
- Joined: 25 Jun 2003 05:41
- Location: CA
MBS wrote:Кто знает, кому exactly надо адресовать письмо, чтобы expedite name check?
Понравилась прозвучавшая здесь идея, что детям FAFSA для колледжа не полагается из-за того что гринкарты нет. Вдруг, прокатит?
Если у кого образец подобного письма есть, буду премного благодарен!
Нет таких мест где гарантируют ускорение проверок
(кроме суда в случае положительного решения по иску).
Народ стучится всюду куда можно - авось кто-нибудь да поможет.
-
MBS
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006 05:16
-
NskCA
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 1562
- Joined: 25 Jun 2003 05:41
- Location: CA
-
rvd
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 04 Aug 2005 19:12
-
Pirx
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 983
- Joined: 03 Aug 2005 20:53
- Location: 3-я планета от Солнца
rvd wrote:а что, ето как-то связано, какая специальность? я думал, name check - он для всех, а не только для физиков.
Нэймчек - он для всех: для физиков, для лириков, и даже для ПН (
). Но различие всё таки есть. Я когда-то приводил цитату из одного документа (http://forum.privet.com/viewtopic.php?p=1910600#1910600), выделено красным.Нет пределов нашему интегралу!
-
MBS
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 2086
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006 05:16
Pirx wrote:Я когда-то приводил цитату из одного документа (http://forum.privet.com/viewtopic.php?p=1910600#1910600), выделено красным.
Извините, но это какой-то глупый документ. Как такое может быть:
"FBI returned about 59 percent of the names within 10 days, and 72 percent were returned within 30 days" ?
-
Cliff
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 6207
- Joined: 06 Jul 2003 19:34
- Location: Monterey Bay
MBS wrote:Pirx wrote:Я когда-то приводил цитату из одного документа (http://forum.privet.com/viewtopic.php?p=1910600#1910600), выделено красным.
Извините, но это какой-то глупый документ. Как такое может быть:
"FBI returned about 59 percent of the names within 10 days, and 72 percent were returned within 30 days" ?
Значит за период с 10-го по 30-й день ФБР обработало еще 13 процентов имен в дополнение к 59-ти, обработанным за первые 10 дней, доведя таким образом общее число обработанных за 30 дней кейсов до 72 процентов.