aas996 wrote:Christopher wrote:I was saying that Powell is a very experienced and Respected member of international political community, he has cut a lot of good deals for America. And Condi is just a puppet.
All cabinet members serve at the pleasure of the President and, in that sense,
are his puppets. Condi has a tremendous foreign policy and national security experience (both academic and practical) and, unlike Powell, speaks several foreign languages (one, BTW, being Russian).
I agree that Condi is qualified. So far, major criticisms I've read of Condi have to do with the fact that she is too closely allied with the president (it may serve as a benefint during negotiations, as it will be recognized that she speaks on his behalf /this opinion is from Belgravian Dispatch/). Another opinion (forget from where) seems to do with her close alighnment with Sharon's policies. Let's face it (and this point was well made in "The Control Room") nowadays everything is about Palestine and Israel. So,the point the blogger was making was that Condi can not be impartial and fair - something that's needed in order to marshall the peace process.
People from the left and the right consider Condi "smart, hyper-competent, articulate"
Ah, Juan Cole, who seems to be very well versed in affairs in the middle east, while being rather critical of this administration:
I saw Lawrence Eagleburger on CNN Monday evening say that he thought Condi Rice was not right for Secretary of State because she had been in the White House for four years and, he implied, would be incapable of offering George W. Bush independent advice. Eagleburger was secretary of state very briefly at the end of the Bush senior administration, succeeding James Baker, with whom he continued to have an association. Eagleburger has been critical of the Neoconservatives, and I suspect he feels that Dr. Rice will be no counterweight to them whatsoever.
Rice seems to me to have two major drawbacks as Secretary of State beyond her inability to challenge Bush's pet projects. One is that she is an old Soviet hand who still thinks in Cold War terms. She focuses on states and does not understand the threat of al-Qaeda, nor does she understand or empathize with Middle Easterners, about whom she appears to know nothing after all this time. The other drawback is that she is virtually a cheerleader for Ariel Sharon and will not be an honest broker between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Powell was much more fair on such issues, though he wasn't exactly pro-Palestinian either. Of course, with Elliot Abrams as the national security council staffer in charge of Arab-Israeli things, you might as well have Sharon just run US Middle East policy himself.
Debate betwen the right and the left leaning political journalists seems to center on whether Condi can provide perspective, and whether she will step up to the plate to battle Rummy/Cheney. She is seen as a bit less hawkish.